Cross-Validation of Two Commercial Methods for Volumetric High-Resolution Dose Reconstruction on a Phantom for Non-Coplanar VMAT Beams
V. Feygelman, et al., Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, US
Radiother. Oncol. 110(3), (2014)
Search all publications
222 Publications
Using a Novel Dose QA Tool to Quantify the Impact of Systematic Errors Otherwise Undetected by Conventional QA Methods: Clinical Head and Neck Case Studies
M. Chan, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Basking Ridge, NJ, U.S.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 2013 June 24
Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC, Merrimac, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 40 (11), (2013)
Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA
H. Zhen, et al., Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 38, (2011)
Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC and Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Merrimac, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 38, (2011)
Motion as a perturbation: Measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries
V. Feygelman, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 39, (2012)
Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA
A. Olch, et al., University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Radiation Oncology Program, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.
Med. Phys. 39, (2012).
3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pre-treatment verification
Carrasco et al.
Med. Phys. 39, (2012)
VMAT QA: Measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC, Merrimac, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 39, (2012)
Validation of measurement-guided 3D VMAT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom
D. Opp, V. Feygelman, et al., Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.
JACMP 14(4), (2013)
Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT Deliveries
A. Agnew, et al., Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK
Phys. Med. Biol. 59, (2014)
A comparison between direct TMR measurements and TMRs calculated from PDDs using BJR Supplement 25 data for flattened and unflattened photon beam
B. Sutherland et al.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015 Sep;38(3):503-7.
Intra- and intervariability in beam data commissioning among water phantom scanning systems
Y. Akino, et al., Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jul 8;15(4):4850.
Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram
M. Stasi, et al., Department of Medical Physics, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, IT
Med. Phys. 39, (2012)
Tomotherapy treatment plan quality assurance: The impact of applied criteria on passing rate in gamma index method
S. Bresciani, et al., Medical Physics Division, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCCS), Candiolo (TO), Italy
Med. Phys. 40, (2013)
On the sensitivity of common gamma-index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assurance
G. Heilemann, et al., Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, U.S.
Med Phys. 40, (2013)
In vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy
B Mijnheer et al.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, International Atomic Energy Agency, University of Chicago Medical Center, Med. Phys. 40 (7), July 2013
Do Task Group External Beam QA Recommendations Guarantee Accurate Treatment Plan Dose Delivery?
A. Templeton, et al., Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 42, 3395 (2015)
A quantification of the effectiveness of EPID dosimetry and software-based plan verification systems in detecting incidents in radiotherapy
C. Bojechko, et al.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Med Phys 42(9), Sept 2015
Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry
A. Mans, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2638-44