Publications

Key Small Field QA Publications

Sun Nuclear

In Vivo dosimetry using CBCT and EPID device; analysis of sources of errors in VMAT Treatments

S. Bresciani, et al., Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Medical Physics, Candiolo TO, IT

ESTRO 2019

A hybrid volumetric dose verficiation method for single-isocenter mutliple-target cranial SRS

S. Ahmed, et al.

Med Phys 2018; Vol 19, Iss 5:1–8

EPID Dosimetry in SunCHECK™ Patient: EPID Calibration, Pre-Treatment QA and In-Vivo Monitoring

Sun Nuclear Corporation, White Paper

Secondary Calculations: Revisiting Rationale, Rethinking Methodologies

Sun Nuclear White Paper

Comparison of two different EPID-based solutions performing pretreatment quality assurance: 2D portal dosimetry versus 3D forward projection method

S. Bresciani, et al.

European Journal of Med Physics, 52 (65-71) (2018)

Efficiently train and validate a RapidPlan model through APQM scoring

Fusella, et al., Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, IT,

Med Phys., 2018 Jun; 45(6):2611-2619. doi: 10.1002/mp.12896.

Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution

A. Scaggion, et al., Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, IT

European Journal of Med Physics, 53 (86-93) (2018)

Quantification of Beam Steering with an Ionization Chamber Array

S. Gao, P. Balter, et al., Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 May; 19(3): 168–176

On the Matter of Forward Versus Back Projection for Radiotherapy 3D Dose Reconstruction

Sun Nuclear Whitepaper

Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual‐source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability

J. Solomon, et al., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.,

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 42 (8), (2015)

A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems

J. Wilson, et al., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.,

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 40 (3), (2013)

A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs‐at‐risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning

S. Ahmed et al.

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 44(10), (2017)

Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning

D. Fried, et al.

JACMP 18(5), (2017)

Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images

A. Olch, A. Zhuang, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.

J Appl Clin Med Phys (2018)

Head to head comparison of two commercial phantoms used for SRS QA

V. Sarkar, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.

Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT (4) (2016)

Beam Scanning with an Out-of-Field Reference Detector: Practical Advantages and Workflow Considerations

Sun Nuclear Corporation, White Paper

Comparison of CT number calibration techniques for CBCT-based dose calculation

Dunlop, et al

Royal Marsden Hospital, UK, Strahlenther Onkol, 191: 970-978 (2015)

TH-CD-205-12: Application of the AAPM TPS Professional Practice Guideline in Commissioning a Paired Prototype Linear Accelerator/TPS

Y Li, et al., The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.

AAPM 2017

Evaluation of ArcCHECK SNC Machine QA tool for Modern Linear Accelerator

V. Mhatre, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital & Medical Research Institute · Department of Radiation Oncology

Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2017; 5(1):5111. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.51.11