Assessing IMRT Treatment Delivery Accuracy and Consistency On a Varian TrueBeam Using the SunNuclear PerFRACTION EPID Dosimetry Software
S Dieterich et al.
Med. Phys. 42, 3362 (2015)
Search all publications
227 Publications
Reproducibility and Consistency of Two Sun Nuclear 3D Scanning Tanks
J. Hessler, et al., OH State University, Columbus, OH, U.S.
Med. Phys. 42, 3492 (2015)
Automated Daily EPID Exit Dose Analysis Uncovers Treatment Variations
A. Olch
Med. Phys. 42, 3363 (2015)
Optimizing the accuracy of a helical diode array dosimeter: A comprehensive calibration methodology coupled with a novel virtual inclinometer
J. Kozelka, V. Feygelman, et al., Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 38 (9), (2011)
Pretreatment quality assurance of flattening filter free beams on 224 patients for intensity modulated plans: A multicentric study
S. Lang, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Zurich, Switzerland
Med. Phys. 39 (3), (2012)
Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system
M. Lin, et al., Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
JACMP 14 (2), (2013)
A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy
Q. Wang et al
Med. Phys. 40 (10), (2013)
Robotic radiosurgery system patient-specific QA for extracranial treatments using the planar ion chamber array and the cylindrical diode array
M. Lin, et al., University of Maryland School of Medicine, MD, U.S.
JACMP 16 (4), (2015)
A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems
Mohammad Hussein et al
Radiotherapy and Oncology 109 (2013) 370-376
Wide Field Array Calibration Dependence on Beam Shape Stability
T. Simon, et al., University of Florida, Dpt. of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, Sun Nuclear Corp., Gainesville, FL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 37, 3428 (2010)
Motion as a perturbation: Measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries
V. Feygelman, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 39, (2012)
Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for the delivery of 60Co Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Subject to a .35-T Lateral Magnetic Field
H. Harold Li, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, U.S.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology/Physics, (2014)
The ArcCHECK diode array for Dosimetric verification of HybridArc
A. L. Petoukvova, et al., Radiotherapy Centre West, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Phys. Med. Biol. 56, (2011)
Measurement-guided volumetric dose reconstruction for helical tomotherapy
C. Stambaugh, et al., University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Vol. 16, No 2 (2014)
Experimentally studied dynamic dose interplay does not meaningfully affect target dose in VMAT SBRT lung treatments
C. Stambaugh, et al., Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.
Med. Phys. 40, (2013
Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics
L. Coleman, C. Skourou, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland
Med. Phys. 40 (11), (2013)
Using a Novel Dose QA Tool to Quantify the Impact of Systematic Errors Otherwise Undetected by Conventional QA Methods: Clinical Head and Neck Case Studies
M. Chan, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Basking Ridge, NJ, U.S.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 2013 June 24
Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC, Merrimac, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 40 (11), (2013)
Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA
H. Zhen, et al., Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 38, (2011)
Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC and Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Merrimac, WI, U.S.
Med. Phys. 38, (2011)