Acceptance and verification of a Halcyon-Eclipse linear accelerator-treatment planning system without 3D water scanning
S. Gao, et al. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
J Appl Clin Med Phys, Aug 2019;1-7
Search all publications
209 Publications
The Effect of Acoustic Velocity on Phantom Measurements
A. Goldstein, Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, U.S.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 26, pp. 1133-1143, 2003
Stereotactic QA: saving time, delivering outcomes
Physics World, July 2019
Comprehensive evaluation of the high resolution diode array for SRS dosimetry
S. Ahmed, V. Feygelman, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, US
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2019; 1-11
First MR-Guided Online Adaptive Patient Treatment in North America On An In-Room High Field (1.5 T) MRI Linac
S. Vedam, et al., MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.
AAPM 2019
Clinical Experience of Patient-Specific QA for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy Using Elekta Unity MR-Linac
J. Yang, et al.
AAPM 2019
1-year experience with automated transit in vivo dosimetry in a busy multicenter department
E. Bossuyt, et al.,
ESTRO 2019
First Report of the Clinical use of a Commercial Automated System for Daily Patient QA using EPID Exit Images
A. Olch, et al., Radiation Oncology Department, University of Southern California, California Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CS, U.S.
Advances in Radiation Oncology (2019) 1-7
Validation of three-dimensional electronic portal imaging device-based PerFRACTION™ software for patient-specific quality assurance
Sait A, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Centre Eastern Caribbean, St. John's, Antigua
J Med Phys 2019;44:16-20
Towards real time radiation therapy: GPU accelerated superposition/ convolution
Jacques, R., et al.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 98(3), 2010
Real Time dose computation; GPU-accelerated source modeling and superposition/convolution
R. Jacques, et al., School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, U.S.
Medical Phys 38(1), Jan 2011
Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems
B. Nelms, et al., Canis Lupus LLC, Merrimac, Wisconsin; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.
Practical Radiation Oncology 2012
Utilization of Pinnacle Auto-planning and Sun Nuclear’s Plan IQ to Improve Efficiency
Swanson, W., et al
AAMD 2019
Experience in commissioning The Halcyon linac
T. Netherton, et al., University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
Med. Phys., July 2019
Plan Quality Comparison for Cervical Carcinoma Treated with Halcyon and Trilogy Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
C Li, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan
PO-GePV-P-89, AAPM 2019
Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison Between Halcyon 2.0 and Tomotherapy Hi-Art
W Feng, et al. St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, U.S.
PO-GePV-T-207, AAPM 2019
Optimized Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Technique for Left Sided Breast Cancer Comprehensive Radiation Therapy Via the Halcyon Delivery System
S. Goddu, et al., Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, U.S.
TU-F115-GePD-F7-4, AAPM 2019
Clinical Evaluation of Lung SBRT for the Halcyon Platform and Dosimetric Comparison with the Truebeam STx and Millennium MLC Systems
C. Kennedy, et al. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
SU-F-SAN4-8, AAPM 2019