Publications

Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual‐source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability

J. Solomon, et al., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.,

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 42 (8), (2015)

A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems

J. Wilson, et al., Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.,

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 40 (3), (2013)

A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs‐at‐risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning

S. Ahmed et al.

International Journal of Medical Physics Research and Practice 44(10), (2017)

Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning

D. Fried, et al.

JACMP 18(5), (2017)

Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images

A. Olch, A. Zhuang, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.

J Appl Clin Med Phys (2018)

Head to head comparison of two commercial phantoms used for SRS QA

V. Sarkar, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.

Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT (4) (2016)

Beam Scanning with an Out-of-Field Reference Detector: Practical Advantages and Workflow Considerations

Sun Nuclear Corporation, White Paper

Comparison of CT number calibration techniques for CBCT-based dose calculation

Dunlop, et al

Royal Marsden Hospital, UK, Strahlenther Onkol, 191: 970-978 (2015)

TH-CD-205-12: Application of the AAPM TPS Professional Practice Guideline in Commissioning a Paired Prototype Linear Accelerator/TPS

Y Li, et al., The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.

AAPM 2017

Evaluation of ArcCHECK SNC Machine QA tool for Modern Linear Accelerator

V. Mhatre, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital & Medical Research Institute · Department of Radiation Oncology

Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2017; 5(1):5111. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.51.11

SU-I-GPD-T-526: Preliminary Evaluation of a Reference Detector Measuring Leakage Radiation for Use in Small Field Beam Data Acquisition

A. Gopal, et al., Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, U.S.

AAPM 2017

Validation of a GPU-Based 3D dose calculator for modulated beams

S. Ahmed, V. Feygelman, et al., USF, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, U.S.

J Appl Clin Med Phys (2017)

A Novel Daily QA System for Proton Therapy

X. Ding et al.

JACMP 14(2) 115-126 (March 2013)

Performance of a Multi-axis Ionization Chamber Array in a 1.5 T Magnetic Field

K. Smit, et al., Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Physics in Medicine and Biology, 59(7) (2014)

Continuous versus step-by-step scanning mode of a novel 3D scanner for CyberKnife measurements

M. Al Kafi, et al.,

Saudi Arabia Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Vol 105 (2015) 88-91

Filmless methods for quality assurance of Tomotherapy using ArcCHECK

B. Yang, et al., Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong

Med. Phys., 44 (7-8) (Jan 2017)

Commissioning Monte Carlo algorithm for robotic radiosurgery using cylindrical 3D-array with variable density inserts

Dechambre, et al., Liege University Hospital, Belgium

European Journal of Med Physics, 33 (152-158) (2017)

Can a commercially available EPID dosimetry system detect small daily patient setup errors for cranial IMRT/SRS?

E. Hsieh, S. Dietrich, et al. University of San Diego

PRO Journal, 2017, Vol 7, Issue 4, Pages e283–e290

Beam Quality Verification Using IC Profiler with Quad Wedge Accessories

Tirpak et al.

Varian Technical Bulletin

Measuring Beam Energy and Symmetry Constancy with an Ion Chamber Array

Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

Varian Technical Bulletin